Apparently xrange is faster but I have no idea why it's faster (and no proof besides the anecdotal so far that it is faster) or what besides that is different about
for i in range(0, 20):
for i in xrange(0, 20):
In Python 2.x:
range
creates a list, so if you do range(1, 10000000)
it creates a list in memory with 9999999
elements.
xrange
is a sequence object that evaluates lazily.
In Python 3, range
does the equivalent of python's xrange
, and to get the list, you have to use list(range(...))
.