Is it possible to implement a Python for range loop without an iterator variable?

James McMahon picture James McMahon · May 4, 2009 · Viewed 111.6k times · Source

Is it possible to do following without the i?

for i in range(some_number):
    # do something

If you just want to do something N amount of times and don't need the iterator.

Answer

Unknown picture Unknown · May 4, 2009

Off the top of my head, no.

I think the best you could do is something like this:

def loop(f,n):
    for i in xrange(n): f()

loop(lambda: <insert expression here>, 5)

But I think you can just live with the extra i variable.

Here is the option to use the _ variable, which in reality, is just another variable.

for _ in range(n):
    do_something()

Note that _ is assigned the last result that returned in an interactive python session:

>>> 1+2
3
>>> _
3

For this reason, I would not use it in this manner. I am unaware of any idiom as mentioned by Ryan. It can mess up your interpreter.

>>> for _ in xrange(10): pass
...
>>> _
9
>>> 1+2
3
>>> _
9

And according to Python grammar, it is an acceptable variable name:

identifier ::= (letter|"_") (letter | digit | "_")*