What is faster for loop using enumerate or for loop using xrange in Python?

python loops xrange
ichigo picture ichigo · Jan 31, 2011 · Viewed 16.9k times · Source

What is faster, a for loop using enumerate or using xrange?

EDIT: I have tested, and I just see minimal differences.

Answer

cemper93 picture cemper93 · Jan 31, 2011

Enumerate is slightly faster. Tested in Python 3:

>>>import pygame
>>>pygame.init()
>>>clock = pygame.time.Clock()
>>>a = list(range(100000))
>>>def do_with_range():
...    clock.tick()
...    k = 0
...    for i in range(len(a)):
...        k += a[i]
...    print(clock.tick())
>>>def do_with_enumerate():
...    clock.tick()
...    k = 0
...    for i, j in enumerate(a):
...        k += j
...    print(clock.tick())
>>>do_with_range()
23
>>>do_with_enumerate()
21

If a wouldn't be a list, but a generator, it would be significantly faster to use enumerate (74ms using range, 23ms using enumerate).

Related questions

What is the difference between range and xrange functions in Python 2.X?

Apparently xrange is faster but I have no idea why it's faster (and no proof besides the anecdotal so far that it is faster) or what besides that is different about for i in range(0, 20): for i in xrange(0, 20):

Read More
Iterating in a closed range [a, b] in python

I want to iterate over a closed range of integers [a, b] in python, ie. iterating from a to b including both a and b. I know the following way of doing it: for i in range(a, b+1): do_…

Read More
Python xrange with float

Beginner programmer here. Is there a way to use float values within the bounds of xrange as well as the step value? I have seen a few solutions for stepping with a float but not for the actual bounds. Essentially …

Read More