Classification problems, such as logistic regression or multinomial logistic regression, optimize a cross-entropy loss. Normally, the cross-entropy layer follows the softmax layer, which produces probability distribution.
In tensorflow, there are at least a dozen of different cross-entropy loss functions:
tf.losses.softmax_cross_entropy
tf.losses.sparse_softmax_cross_entropy
tf.losses.sigmoid_cross_entropy
tf.contrib.losses.softmax_cross_entropy
tf.contrib.losses.sigmoid_cross_entropy
tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits
tf.nn.sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits
Which one works only for binary classification and which are suitable for multi-class problems? When should you use sigmoid
instead of softmax
? How are sparse
functions different from others and why is it only softmax
?
Related (more math-oriented) discussion: What are the differences between all these cross-entropy losses in Keras and TensorFlow?.
In functional sense, the sigmoid is a partial case of the softmax function, when the number of classes equals 2. Both of them do the same operation: transform the logits (see below) to probabilities.
In simple binary classification, there's no big difference between the two, however in case of multinomial classification, sigmoid allows to deal with non-exclusive labels (a.k.a. multi-labels), while softmax deals with exclusive classes (see below).
A logit (also called a score) is a raw unscaled value associated with a class, before computing the probability. In terms of neural network architecture, this means that a logit is an output of a dense (fully-connected) layer.
Tensorflow naming is a bit strange: all of the functions below accept logits, not probabilities, and apply the transformation themselves (which is simply more efficient).
tf.nn.sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits
tf.nn.weighted_cross_entropy_with_logits
tf.losses.sigmoid_cross_entropy
tf.contrib.losses.sigmoid_cross_entropy
(DEPRECATED)As stated earlier, sigmoid
loss function is for binary classification.
But tensorflow functions are more general and allow to do
multi-label classification, when the classes are independent.
In other words, tf.nn.sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits
solves N
binary classifications at once.
The labels must be one-hot encoded or can contain soft class probabilities.
tf.losses.sigmoid_cross_entropy
in addition allows to set the in-batch weights,
i.e. make some examples more important than others.
tf.nn.weighted_cross_entropy_with_logits
allows to set class weights
(remember, the classification is binary), i.e. make positive errors larger than
negative errors. This is useful when the training data is unbalanced.
tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits
(DEPRECATED IN 1.5)tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits_v2
tf.losses.softmax_cross_entropy
tf.contrib.losses.softmax_cross_entropy
(DEPRECATED)These loss functions should be used for multinomial mutually exclusive classification,
i.e. pick one out of N
classes. Also applicable when N = 2
.
The labels must be one-hot encoded or can contain soft class probabilities: a particular example can belong to class A with 50% probability and class B with 50% probability. Note that strictly speaking it doesn't mean that it belongs to both classes, but one can interpret the probabilities this way.
Just like in sigmoid
family, tf.losses.softmax_cross_entropy
allows
to set the in-batch weights, i.e. make some examples more important than others.
As far as I know, as of tensorflow 1.3, there's no built-in way to set class weights.
[UPD] In tensorflow 1.5, v2
version was introduced and the original softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits
loss got deprecated. The only difference between them is that in a newer version, backpropagation happens into both logits and labels (here's a discussion why this may be useful).
tf.nn.sparse_softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits
tf.losses.sparse_softmax_cross_entropy
tf.contrib.losses.sparse_softmax_cross_entropy
(DEPRECATED)Like ordinary softmax
above, these loss functions should be used for
multinomial mutually exclusive classification, i.e. pick one out of N
classes.
The difference is in labels encoding: the classes are specified as integers (class index),
not one-hot vectors. Obviously, this doesn't allow soft classes, but it
can save some memory when there are thousands or millions of classes.
However, note that logits
argument must still contain logits per each class,
thus it consumes at least [batch_size, classes]
memory.
Like above, tf.losses
version has a weights
argument which allows
to set the in-batch weights.
These functions provide another alternative for dealing with huge number of classes. Instead of computing and comparing an exact probability distribution, they compute a loss estimate from a random sample.
The arguments weights
and biases
specify a separate fully-connected layer that
is used to compute the logits for a chosen sample.
Like above, labels
are not one-hot encoded, but have the shape [batch_size, num_true]
.
Sampled functions are only suitable for training. In test time, it's recommended to
use a standard softmax
loss (either sparse or one-hot) to get an actual distribution.
Another alternative loss is tf.nn.nce_loss
, which performs noise-contrastive estimation (if you're interested, see this very detailed discussion). I've included this function to the softmax family, because NCE guarantees approximation to softmax in the limit.