Are there any downsides to using double-slashes in URLs?

wyqydsyq picture wyqydsyq · Jun 29, 2012 · Viewed 7.6k times · Source

I've written my own MVC framework in PHP, which uses urls in the format of:

/controller/method/param1/param2/param...

I've made it so that "default" methods can be ignored (by default index()), so this results in URLs like /controller//param1/param2/param.... For example, a URL of: /view//panel-glide/3 will call index('panel-glide', 3) in the view controller.

This works fine and dandy, but I'm concerned that search engines or some older browsers might freak out when they see the double slashes, as I don't think I've actually seem them ever be used before.

Is anyone aware of any issues I might come across by using this?

Answer

voithos picture voithos · Jun 29, 2012

There is an existing answer on WebMasters that discusses the dangers of having two slashes. It discusses Apache a lot, but the ideas should be applicable generally.

In essence, I don't think it is recommended. /foo/bar and /foo//bar really should be two completely different paths. Each slash is significant, and attempts at circumventing that standardization are bound to come back to bite you.

As is mentioned in the answer, there's also a very real danger of relative paths failing. Some browsers will correctly figure that a relative path ../../fizz from /foo/bar//baz is /foo/bar/fizz, while others will treat the double slash as a single one, and opt for /foo/fizz.

Plus, I think it looks funny.