Why should you base64 encode the Authorization header?

skaterdav85 picture skaterdav85 · Oct 28, 2015 · Viewed 13.5k times · Source

Twitter's API requires sending an Authorization header that is a base64 encoding of an API key concatenated with an API secret key. In Node, I use:

var base64 = new Buffer(apiKey + ':' + apiSecret).toString('base64');

The header sent becomes:

Authorization: 'Basic ' + base64

What is the point of base64 encoding the string "apiKeyHere:apiSecretHere"? Why not just accept an Authorization header containing the raw api credentials?

This question is similar to What is the purpose of base 64 encoding and why it used in HTTP Basic Authentication? but the voted answer doesn't fully answer my question. Twitter's api key and api secret key are already HTTP compatible characters. They look something like this (these are not real):

Consumer Key (API Key) 8dme3utVQfOhlPk5BUG9XbFxR

Consumer Secret (API Secret) QFZXoC7MP72JZtGMBNpjLGI4Vl1xr1q9dyPLp3u7jGtkESpbLm

So why base64 encode it? Furthermore, that post states "the intent of the encoding is to encode non-HTTP-compatible characters that may be in the user name or password into those that are HTTP-compatible." Wouldn't a username and password already be HTTP compatible characters?

Answer

Ivar picture Ivar · Oct 29, 2015

Eventhough I can't find it in the w3 documentation, I believe that it is just protocol to encode the credentials of the Authorization header to base64, no matter what content it has. In the case of Twitter it doesn't make much difference as you said, but in other cases the credentials can contain these characters. To keep it uniform and prevent mistakes of whether it should be encoded or not, all credentials should be encoded.

Another reason could be, that browsers also encode the credentials the same way. Twitter probably also wants to accept that.