Scenario:
<activation><property><name>foo</name></property><activation>
foo
property - the profile is inactive and will not be executed for the parent build<properties><foo>true</foo></properties>
in the child with hope that the property will be picked up when child build is executed and profile will be activated. No such luck. Profile is never activated, which tells me that property is never set.mvn package -Dfoo=true
activates profile in both parent and childAm I trying to do the impossible or just doing it wrong?
P.S. Hmmm - even if I define property in the parent, the profile is not triggered. What gives?
To expand on @rich-seller's answer, and @Bostone's self-answer, it seems to be impossible to have a setup where the parent POM defines a few profiles as alternatives, and child POMs select one of these profiles by default, while allowing you to override the choice for a child temporarily (i.e. on the CLI). Consider a parent POM for projects which use some framework and an associated plugin, both of whose versions we can assume are defined by properties:
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>newest</id>
<activation>
<activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault>
</activation>
<properties>
<framework.version>2.0</framework.version>
<plugin.version>2.0</plugin.version>
</properties>
</profile>
<profile>
<id>older</id>
<activation>
<property>
<name>older.framework</name>
<value>true</value>
</property>
</activation>
<properties>
<framework.version>1.1</framework.version>
<plugin.version>1.1</plugin.version>
</properties>
</profile>
</profiles>
Now a child inheriting from this parent POM by default will use 2.0 as you would expect, and -Polder
or -Dolder.framework=true
will work to try building it with the older framework (e.g. to test compatibility). However you cannot write in the child POM
<properties>
<older.framework>true</older.framework>
</properties>
and have the older
profile be activated automatically. You could use file-based activation to make this module build against 1.1 if newest
were not active by default, but then it is not easy to temporarily run it against 2.0: as far as I know both older
and newest
profiles would be active if you passed -Pnewest
, so you need to explicitly disable other profiles which is unreasonable if you have a dozen of them. So there is just no solution except to copy the profile information to the child POM:
<properties>
<framework.version>1.1</framework.version>
<plugin.version>1.1</plugin.version>
</properties>
at which point -Pnewest
will not work to override these properties, so you need to use -Dframework.version=2.0 -Dplugin.version=2.0
.
In other words, the profiles are only useful if all the child modules can use the same profile (here newest
) by default. If some of them are normally built with 1.1 and some with 2.0, the profiles are useless.
Seems like this is a use case for a Maven core enhancement, or perhaps a Maven 3 build extension. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Custom+Profile+Activators and https://github.com/maoo/maven-tiles come to mind.