Robot.delay(int) versus Thread.sleep(long)

java multithreading delay sleep awtrobot
Maarx picture Maarx · Jul 7, 2010 · Viewed 7.9k times · Source

I have a program whose only purpose is to drive a java.awt.Robot in an infinite loop until an exit condition is met.

The robot performs a number of actions in quick succession, which require a standard UI delay between them. For this, I use java.awt.Robot.setAutoDelay(int ms), which appears to be designed for precisely this purpose.

At other times, however, I need to insert arbitrarily long delays for operations to complete. I appear to have a choice between using java.awt.Robot.delay(int ms) or java.lang.Thread.sleep(long ms), and am curious what the differences between them are, and which I should use.

My gut instinct was to keep all my operations in the same "place", and use java.awt.Robot.delay(int ms). However, after thinking about it for a moment, I assumed that java.awt.Robot.delay(int ms) would put an operation on the Robot's stack of operations to complete, and if those were my only delays in an infinite loop, I may very quickly, and needlessly, generate an absurdly large queue of events for the Robot.

At that point, I checked the API for java.awt.Robot.delay(int ms), which told me the following:

Sleeps for the specified time. To catch any InterruptedExceptions that occur, Thread.sleep() may be used instead.

Having failed to gain any useful insight into the matter, I elected to ask you guys.

Answer

user85421 picture user85421 · Jul 8, 2010

At first I would also assume that using delay() would generate a large queue of events, in particular after reading the javadoc for waitForIdle():

Waits until all events currently on the event queue have been processed

but checking the source code of Robot.delay() shows that it basically is a Thread.sleep(), after checking that the delay time is positive and not more than 1 minute!

Abstract: both solutions are almost the same, use Thread.sleep() for delaying longer than 1 minute or catching the InterruptedException.

after years of programming with Java I found how to sleep without having to catch the InterruptedException (disregarding the overhead of creating a Robot)

Related questions

Call method after some delay in java

Scenario is like : In my application, I opened one file, updated it and saved. Once the file saved event get fired and it will execute one method abc(). But now, I want to add delay after save event get fired, …

Read More
Difference between wait() and sleep()

What is the difference between a wait() and sleep() in Threads? Is my understanding that a wait()-ing Thread is still in running mode and uses CPU cycles but a sleep()-ing does not consume any CPU cycles correct? Why …

Read More
"implements Runnable" vs "extends Thread" in Java

From what time I've spent with threads in Java, I've found these two ways to write threads: With implements Runnable: public class MyRunnable implements Runnable { public void run() { //Code } } //Started with a "new Thread(new MyRunnable()).start()" call Or, with …

Read More