Ok so this is probably a trivial question but I'm having trouble visualizing and understanding the differences and when to use each. I'm also a little unclear as to how concepts like uni-directional and bi-directional mappings affect the one-to-many/many-to-many relationships. I'm using Hibernate right now so any explanation that's ORM related will be helpful.
As an example let's say I have the following set-up:
public class Person{
private Long personId;
private Set<Skill> skills;
//Getters and setters
}
public class Skill{
private Long skillId;
private String skillName;
//Getters and setters
}
So in this case what kind of mapping would I have? Answers to this specific example are definitely appreciated but I would also really like an overview of when to use either one-to-many and many-to-many and when to use a join table versus a join column and unidirectional versus bidirectional.
Looks like everyone is answering One-to-many
vs. Many-to-many
:
The difference between One-to-many
, Many-to-one
and Many-to-Many
is:
One-to-many
vs Many-to-one
is a matter of perspective. Unidirectional
vs Bidirectional
will not affect the mapping but will make difference on how you can access your data.
Many-to-one
the many
side will keep reference of the one
side. A good example is "A State has Cities". In this case State
is the one side and City
is the many side. There will be a column state_id
in the table cities
.In unidirectional,
Person
class will haveList<Skill> skills
butSkill
will not havePerson person
. In bidirectional, both properties are added and it allows you to access aPerson
given a skill( i.e.skill.person
).
One-to-Many
the one side will be our point of reference. For example, "A User has Addresses". In this case we might have three columns address_1_id
, address_2_id
and address_3_id
or a look up table with unique constraint on user_id
and address_id
.In unidirectional, a
User
will haveAddress address
. Bidirectional will have an additionalList<User> users
in theAddress
class.
Many-to-Many
members of each party can hold reference to arbitrary number of members of the other party. To achieve this a look up table is used. Example for this is the relationship between doctors and patients. A doctor can have many patients and vice versa.