I am trying to develop generic DAO in java. I have tried the following. Is this a good way to implement generic DAO? I don't want to use hibernate. I am trying to make it as generic as possible so that I don't have to repeat the same code over and over again.
public abstract class AbstractDAO<T> {
protected ResultSet findbyId(String tablename, Integer id){
ResultSet rs= null;
try {
// the following lines are not working
pStmt = cn.prepareStatement("SELECT * FROM "+ tablename+ "WHERE id = ?");
pStmt.setInt(1, id);
rs = pStmt.executeQuery();
} catch (SQLException ex) {
System.out.println("ERROR in findbyid " +ex.getMessage() +ex.getCause());
ex.printStackTrace();
}finally{
return rs;
}
}
}
Now I have:
public class UserDAO extends AbstractDAO<User>{
public List<User> findbyid(int id){
Resultset rs =findbyid("USERS",id) // "USERS" is table name in DB
List<Users> users = convertToList(rs);
return users;
}
private List<User> convertToList(ResultSet rs) {
List<User> userList= new ArrayList();
User user= new User();;
try {
while (rs.next()) {
user.setId(rs.getInt("id"));
user.setUsername(rs.getString("username"));
user.setFname(rs.getString("fname"));
user.setLname(rs.getString("lname"));
user.setUsertype(rs.getInt("usertype"));
user.setPasswd(rs.getString("passwd"));
userList.add(user);
}
} catch (SQLException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(UserDAO.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
return userList;
}
}
If you can live with Spring, I will suggest the following improvements:
Independent of using Spring, I will recommend the following:
An improved AbstractDao with Spring:
import java.util.Collection;
import org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate;
import org.springframework.jdbc.core.RowMapper;
public abstract class AbstractDao<T> {
protected final RowMapper<T> rowMapper;
protected final String findByIdSql;
protected final JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
protected AbstractDao(RowMapper<T> rowMapper, String tableName,
JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate) {
this.rowMapper = rowMapper;
this.findByIdSql = "SELECT * FROM " + tableName + "WHERE id = ?";
this.jdbcTemplate = jdbcTemplate;
}
public Collection<T> findById(final String id) {
Object[] params = {id};
return jdbcTemplate.query(findByIdSql, params, rowMapper);
}
}
As you see, no exception handling or hacking with the primitive SQL classes. This templates closes the ResultSet for you, which I can't see in your code.
And the UserDao:
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate;
import org.springframework.jdbc.core.RowMapper;
public class UserDao extends AbstractDao<User> {
private final static String TABLE_NAME = "USERS";
public UserDao(JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate) {
super(new UserRowMapper(), TABLE_NAME, jdbcTemplate);
}
private static class UserRowMapper implements RowMapper<User> {
public User mapRow(ResultSet rs, int rowNum) throws SQLException {
User user = new User();
user.setUserName(rs.getString("username"));
user.setFirstName(rs.getString("fname"));
user.setLastName(rs.getString("lname"));
return user;
}
}
}
Updated:
When you know the id and the id corresponds to a single row in the database, you should consider returning a generic object instead of a collection.
public T findUniqueObjectById(final String id) {
Object[] params = {id};
return jdbcTemplate.queryForObject(findByIdSql, params, rowMapper);
}
This makes your service code more readable, since you don't need to retrieve the user from a list, but only:
User user = userDao.findUniqueObjectById("22");