Java code coverage in Hudson

java hudson code-coverage cobertura emma
Robert Munteanu picture Robert Munteanu · Sep 14, 2009 · Viewed 8.4k times · Source

I'm migrating a couple of projects from an ant build to a maven one. The build server is , and will remain, Hudson.

I've been having trouble recording code coverage in hudson with cobertura due to the tests run and recorded twice problem.

The project is multi-module and it would be nice, although not required, to have an aggregated output of the code coverage data.

All in all, the solution I'm looking for must:

  • run automated tests for all modules and record the results once;
  • display the individual module code coverage in Hudson;
  • be easily configured once for the whole project, not in every module.

The solution can be based on Cobertura, or Emma, or any other java code coverage tool.

Update: Running the tests with Emma still duplicates the results and there's no merge capability, so it's not really usable with multi-module builds.

Answer

victor hugo picture victor hugo · Oct 3, 2009

Sonar is a very cool tool that is easily integrated with Hudson, I really like its organization with multi-module projects. You should give it a try

alt text http://sonar.codehaus.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dashboard.png

Related questions

Error - trustAnchors parameter must be non-empty

I'm trying to configure my e-mail on Jenkins/Hudson, and I constantly receive the error: java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors parameter must be non-empty I've seen a good amount of information online about the error, but I have not gotten …

Read More
Bamboo Vs. Hudson(a.k.a. Jenkins) vs Any other CI systems

Anyone out there have experience with both Hudson and Bamboo? Any thoughts on the relative strengths and weaknesses of these products? Okay, since folks keep mentioning other CI products I'll open this up further. Here are my general problem. I …

Read More
What is the difference between Hudson and CruiseControl for Java projects?

I think the title sums it up. I just want to know why one or the other is better for continous integration builds of Java projects from Svn.

Read More