NSThread vs. NSOperationQueue vs. ??? on the iPhone

kubi picture kubi · Jun 15, 2010 · Viewed 13.3k times · Source

Currently I'm using NSThread to cache images in another thread.

[NSThread detachNewThreadSelector:@selector(cacheImage:) toTarget:self withObject:image];

Alternately:

[self performSelectorInBackground:@selector(cacheImage:) withObject:image];

Alternately, I can use an NSOperationQueue

NSInvocationOperation *invOperation = [[NSInvocationOperation alloc] initWithTarget:self selector:@selector(cacheImage:) object:image];
NSOperationQueue *opQueue = [[NSOperationQueue alloc] init];
[opQueue addOperation:invOperation];

Is there any reason to switch away from NSThread? GCD is a 4th option when it's released for the iPhone, but unless there's a significant performance gain, I'd rather stick with methods that work in most platforms.


Based on @Jon-Eric's advice, I went with an NSOperationQueue/NSOperation subclass solution. It works very well. The NSOperation class is flexible enough that you can use it with invocations, blocks or custom subclasses, depending on your needs. No matter how you create your NSOperation you can just throw it into an operation queue when you are ready to run it. The operations are designed to work as either objects you put into a queue or you can run them as standalone asynchronous methods, if you want. Since you can easily run your custom operation methods synchronously, testing is trivially easy.

I've used this same technique in a handful of projects since I asked this question and I couldn't be happier with the way it keeps my code and my tests clean, organized and happily asynchronous.

A++++++++++ Would subclass again

Answer

Jon-Eric picture Jon-Eric · Jun 15, 2010

In general you'll get better mileage with NSOperationQueue.

Three specific reasons:

  • You may want to initiate caching of many items at once. NSOperationQueue is smart enough to only create about as many threads as there are cores, queuing the remaining operations. With NSThread, creating 100 threads to cache 100 images is probably overkill and somewhat inefficient.
  • You may want to cancel the cacheImage operation. Implementing cancellation is easier with NSOperationQueue; most the work is already done for you.
  • NSOperationQueue is free to switch to a smarter implementation (like Grand Central Dispatch) now or in the future. NSThread is more likely to always be just an operating system thread.

Bonus:

  • NSOperationQueue has some other nice constructs built-in, such as a sophisticated way of honoring operation priorities and dependencies.