ANTLR Operator Precedence

jameszhao00 picture jameszhao00 · Sep 20, 2009 · Viewed 8.2k times · Source

How is operator precedence implemented in ANTLR?

I'm using the XText/Antlr package at the moment.

Edit:

I did what sepp2k suggested, and operator precedence works now, but stuff like 3 +* also work now. The operators are basically "falling through" the tree.

Also, I tried the C grammar on ANTLR's website and the same thing happened in ANTLRworks.

Anyone know what the issue is?

BinaryExpression:
  'or'? AndOp; //or op

AndOp:
  'and'? ComparisonOp;

ComparisonOp:
  ('>'|'<'|'>='|'<='|'=='|'~=')? ConcatOp;

ConcatOp:
  '..'? AddSubOp;

AddSubOp:
  ('+' | '-')? MultDivOp;

MultDivOp:
  ('*' | '/')? ExpOp;

ExpOp:
  '^'? expr=Expression;

Answer

sepp2k picture sepp2k · Sep 20, 2009

With Xtext / ANTLR 3 you encode the precedence in the grammar rules like this:

Expr:  mult ('+' mult)* ;
Mult:  atom ('*' atom)* ;
Atom:  INT | '(' expr ')' ;

This would parse "1 + 2 * 3 + ( 4 * 5 + 6)" as "(1 + (2 * 3)) + ((4 * 5) + 6)"