In the DirectX mobile lighting sample, a cylinder is generated in the following manner:
for( DWORD i=0; i<50; i++ )
{
FLOAT theta = (2*D3DMX_PI*i)/(50-1);
pVertices[2*i+0].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( (float)sin(theta),-1.0f, (float)cos(theta) );
pVertices[2*i+0].normal = D3DMXVECTOR3( (float)sin(theta), 0.0f, (float)cos(theta) );
pVertices[2*i+1].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( (float)sin(theta), 1.0f, (float)cos(theta) );
pVertices[2*i+1].normal = D3DMXVECTOR3( (float)sin(theta), 0.0f, (float)cos(theta) );
}
Is there a similar way to generate vertices for a sphere in DirectX Mobile(as a triangle strip or otherwise)? (AFAIK there's no D3DMXCreateSphere method)
The final solution .Thanks to quarternion for all his help.
void CreateSphere()
{
const int iFactor = 20;
int iPos = 0;
arr_Vertices = new CUSTOMVERTEX[ui_VCount];
ui_ShapeCount = iFactor *iFactor * 2; // use when rendering
float arrV[iFactor* iFactor][3];
for (DWORD j= 0; j < iFactor; j ++)
{
FLOAT theta = (D3DMX_PI*j)/(iFactor);
for( DWORD i=0; i<iFactor; i++ )
{
iPos = j*iFactor+i;
FLOAT phi = (2*D3DMX_PI*i)/(iFactor);
arrV[iPos][0] = (float)(sin(theta)*cos(phi));
arrV[iPos][1] = (float)(sin(theta)*sin(phi));
arrV[iPos][2] = (float)(cos(theta));
/*std::cout << "[" << j <<"][" << i << "] = " << arrV[iPos][0]
<< "," << arrV[iPos][1] << "," << arrV[iPos][2] <<std::endl;*/
}
}
int iNext = 0;
for (DWORD j= 0; j < iFactor; j ++)
{
for( DWORD i=0; i<iFactor; i++ )
{
if (i == iFactor - 1)
iNext = 0;
else iNext = i +1;
iPos = (j*iFactor*6)+(i*6);
arr_Vertices[iPos].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( arrV[j*iFactor+i][0], arrV[j*iFactor+i][1], arrV[j*iFactor+i][2]);
arr_Vertices[iPos + 1].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( arrV[j*iFactor+iNext][0], arrV[j*iFactor+iNext][1], arrV[j*iFactor+iNext][2]);
if (j != iFactor -1)
arr_Vertices[iPos + 2].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( arrV[((j+1)*iFactor)+i][0], arrV[((j+1)*iFactor)+i][1], arrV[((j+1)*iFactor)+i][2]);
else
arr_Vertices[iPos + 2].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( 0, 0, -1); //Create a pseudo triangle fan for the last set of triangles
arr_Vertices[iPos].normal = D3DMXVECTOR3( arr_Vertices[iPos].position.x, arr_Vertices[iPos].position.y, arr_Vertices[iPos].position.z);
arr_Vertices[iPos + 1].normal = D3DMXVECTOR3( arr_Vertices[iPos+1].position.x, arr_Vertices[iPos+1].position.y, arr_Vertices[iPos+1].position.z);
arr_Vertices[iPos + 2].normal = D3DMXVECTOR3( arr_Vertices[iPos+2].position.x, arr_Vertices[iPos+2].position.y, arr_Vertices[iPos+2].position.z);
arr_Vertices[iPos + 3].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( arr_Vertices[iPos+2].position.x, arr_Vertices[iPos+2].position.y, arr_Vertices[iPos+2].position.z);
arr_Vertices[iPos + 4].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( arr_Vertices[iPos+1].position.x, arr_Vertices[iPos+1].position.y, arr_Vertices[iPos+1].position.z);
if (j != iFactor - 1)
arr_Vertices[iPos + 5].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( arrV[((j+1)*iFactor)+iNext][0], arrV[((j+1)*iFactor)+iNext][1], arrV[((j+1)*iFactor)+iNext][2]);
else
arr_Vertices[iPos + 5].position = D3DMXVECTOR3( 0,0,-1);
arr_Vertices[iPos + 3].normal = D3DMXVECTOR3( arr_Vertices[iPos+3].position.x, arr_Vertices[iPos+3].position.y, arr_Vertices[iPos+3].position.z);
arr_Vertices[iPos + 4].normal = D3DMXVECTOR3( arr_Vertices[iPos+4].position.x, arr_Vertices[iPos+4].position.y, arr_Vertices[iPos+4].position.z);
arr_Vertices[iPos + 5].normal = D3DMXVECTOR3( arr_Vertices[iPos+5].position.x, arr_Vertices[iPos+5].position.y, arr_Vertices[iPos+5].position.z);
//std::cout << "[" << iPos <<"] = " << arr_Vertices[iPos].position.x <<
// "," << arr_Vertices[iPos].position.y <<
// "," << arr_Vertices[iPos].position.z <<std::endl;
//std::cout << "[" << iPos + 1 <<"] = " << arr_Vertices[iPos + 1].position.x <<
// "," << arr_Vertices[iPos+ 1].position.y <<
// "," << arr_Vertices[iPos+ 1].position.z <<std::endl;
//std::cout << "[" << iPos + 2 <<"] = " << arr_Vertices[iPos].position.x <<
// "," << arr_Vertices[iPos + 2].position.y <<
// "," << arr_Vertices[iPos + 2].position.z <<std::endl;
}
}
}
Should be usable with only a few adjustments. This creates a TRIANGLELIST but could be altered to output a set of triangle strips
Answer
Basic way of thinking about it:
First method not using a continuous triangle strip...
It's been a while so I might make a mistake...
A unit circle defined parametrically:
Where 0 =< theta < 2pi
x = sin(theta);
y = cos(theta);
Now that we can define a single circle, imagine concentric rings on the x,y plane. Now imagine raising the inner most circle and as you raise it it pulls up the next ring, like a slinky... This visual only works for half a sphere.
So the form that produces the shape of a sphere from the concentric rings is of course another circle which is orthogonal to the rings, the (z,y) plane... Of course we are only interested in finding the offset of the ring (how high or low it needs to be offset from the (x,y) plane.
Because we just need the offset we only need half a circle... and further the poles will only be a single point. Use a triangle fan at the poles and strips between each ring.
After this mental exercise see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere and search for "The points on the sphere with radius r can be parametrized via" and you'll see the parametric form after that line.
The normals are very easy the sphere should always be built around (0,0,0) and the sphere should always be built with a radius of 1 (so you can simply scale it to the desired size) and then each vertex on the circle surface is equal to the normal.
The above method uses two triangle fans and a series of triangle strips... another method which produces a sphere with an even distribution of vertexes and can be drawn with a single triangle strip, although at the moment I'd go crazy trying to code it involves the following idea:
Imagine a tetrahedron centered about the origin (the points are 1 unit from 0,0,0). It is a pretty pathetic representation of a sphere but it is an approximation. Now imagine that we find the midpoint on each of the four faces and then push that point out until it is on the surface of the sphere. Then we find the midpoints of those faces and push them out to the surface of the sphere...
tetrahdralSphere(int recursions){}
Finding the mid point is very simple it is just the average of each of the x,y,z components. Then since the sphere is a unit sphere moving them to the surface is as simple as normalizing this new vector.
Method one produces a point distribution that looks lines of longitude and latitude and produces a non uniform distribution (it looks just like a globe if using quads and a wire frame), it is quite easy to implement. The second method requires recursion so it a little more difficult but will look more uniform. If you want to get really complicated and hurt your head... then try distributing n points and then simulate a repellent force between points which moves them apart and then normalize them across the surface. There are all kinds of headaches that need to addressed to make this work effectively but then you have rather uniformly distributed points and you can control the number of vertices's and you'll have have the very start of appreciation of what it takes for modeling tools to find the minimal geometry to represent a model.
Going with the first method. Draw a point at (0,0,1) then you need your first concentric ring (each ring will have the same number of points for simplicity).
Lets draw 10 points per ring... so phi will step in increments of 2pi/10 and lets draw 10 concentric rings
and we will draw 10 rings + 2 poles so theta will increase in increments of pi/12.
//this psudo code places the points
//NOT TESTED
deltaTheta = pi/12;
deltaPhi = 2pi/10;
drawVertex(0,0,1) //north pole end cap
for(int ring; ring < 10; ring++){ //move to a new z - offset
theta += deltaTheta;
for(int point; point < 10; point++){ // draw a ring
phi += deltaPhi;
x = sin(theta) * cos(phi)
y = sin(theta) * sin(phi)
z = cos(theta)
drawVertex(x,y,z)
}
}
drawVertex(0, 0, -1) //south pole end cap