Going through SpecFlow docs, I'm trying to figure out if my perception is wrong. I would like to specify several completely different scenarios per feature.
For example:
Feature: Serve coffee
Coffee should not be served until paid for
Coffee should not be served until the button has been pressed
If there is no coffee left then money should be refunded
Scenario: Buy last coffee
Given there are 1 coffees left in the machine
And I have deposited 1$
When I press the coffee button
Then I should be served a coffee
What if I want to check other Scenarios in the "Serve coffee" feature? For example, a scenario where the money was paid but the button was not pressed for 5 minutes.
Does it make sense to have several scenarios or should I use a scenario outline?
Thanks!
Multiple scenarios per feature is fine, so long as they are logically in the same area. If you are attempting to address a different use case I would probably suggest making it a new feature. In your case, it looks like the two scenarios would fit fine under the same feature.
Scenario Outline is analogous to TestCase
in NUnit, you would only use this if the same scenario structure just needs to take different parameters.
Given two scenarios in a feature:
Scenario: eat 5 out of 12
Given there are 12 cucumbers
When I eat 5 cucumbers
Then I should have 7 cucumbers
Scenario: eat 5 out of 20
Given there are 20 cucumbers
When I eat 5 cucumbers
Then I should have 15 cucumbers
You can parameterise repeating parts using an outline:
Scenario Outline: eating
Given there are <start> cucumbers
When I eat <eat> cucumbers
Then I should have <left> cucumbers
Examples:
| start | eat | left |
| 12 | 5 | 7 |
| 20 | 5 | 15 |
This outline replaces the scenario definitions you are trying to parameterise.