I just need someone to tell me if I understood correctly when to use <include>
and when <merge>
.
So, I make a header layout which I want to include into some other XML layout:
<LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:layout_width="fill_parent"
android:layout_height="fill_parent">
<TextView
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:text="Header text" />
</LinearLayout>
And I include it into some other XML this way (which is pretty basic):
<LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:layout_width="fill_parent"
android:layout_height="fill_parent">
<include
android:id="@+id/header"
layout="@layout/top"
android:layout_width="fill_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content" />
</LinearLayout>
This will work well, no issue about it. But in order to optimize the code, I have to use <merge>
in the layout which gets included. So the top layout
should not have a tag <LinearLayout>
but it must look like this:
<merge xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android">
<TextView
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:text="Header text" />
</merge>
Have I understood this correctly?
From my understanding it will set the merge element as the higher element in the view hierarchy. Include will simply put the whole viewgroup in there. So using your example the view hierarchy should look like:
With merge:
LinearLayout (root)
|
TextView
With include:
LinearLayout (root)
|
LinearLayout
|
TextView
So you will have an extra LinearLayout in the view hierarchy that you do not need. However, sometimes you need that intermediate view. In your case, you wouldn't, since both the LinearLayouts have the same layout params and no other differences.