What's the difference between text/xml vs application/xml for webservice response

xml rest jersey
Mike picture Mike · Jan 28, 2011 · Viewed 260.5k times · Source

This is more of a general question about the difference between text/xml and application/xml. I am fairly new to writing webservices (REST - Jersey). I have been producing application/xml since it is what shows up in most tutorials / code examples that I have been using to learn, but I recently found out about text/xml and was wondering what is different about it and when would you use it over application/xml?

Answer

Oded picture Oded · Jan 28, 2011

From the RFC (3023), under section 3, XML Media Types:

If an XML document -- that is, the unprocessed, source XML document -- is readable by casual users, text/xml is preferable to application/xml. MIME user agents (and web user agents) that do not have explicit support for text/xml will treat it as text/plain, for example, by displaying the XML MIME entity as plain text. Application/xml is preferable when the XML MIME entity is unreadable by casual users.

(emphasis mine)

Related questions

SOAP or REST for Web Services?

Is REST a better approach to doing Web Services or is SOAP? Or are they different tools for different problems? Or is it a nuanced issue - that is, is one slightly better in certain arenas than another, etc? I …

Read More
How do you do an HTTP Put?

We have this software that has a webservices component. Now, the administrator of this system has come to me, wanting to import data into the system by using the webservices component. So, I went to read the documentation to try …

Read More
REST - When to use 400 ("Bad Request")

I have a resource like this sales/customers/{customerno}. If a client sends a PUT request to this resource I would return 400 - Bad request if the xml in the entity body is not valid xml. But what if the …

Read More