Confused with syslog message format

qwix picture qwix · Feb 9, 2012 · Viewed 41.3k times · Source

I am a bit confused about syslog message format. I have to write a program that parses syslog messages. When I read what I get in my syslog-ng instance I get messages like this:

Jan 12 06:30:00 1.2.3.4 apache_server: 1.2.3.4 - - [12/Jan/2011:06:29:59 +0100] "GET /foo/bar.html HTTP/1.1" 301 96 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)" PID 18904 Time Taken 0

I can clearly determine the real message (which is, in this case an Apache access log message) The rest is metadata about the syslog message itself.

However when I read the RFC 5424 the message examples look like:

without structured data

 <34>1 2003-10-11T22:14:15.003Z mymachine.example.com su - ID47 - BOM'su root' failed for lonvick on /dev/pts/8

or with structured data

<165>1 2003-10-11T22:14:15.003Z mymachine.example.com evntslog - ID47 [exampleSDID@32473 iut="3" eventSource="Application" eventID="1011"] BOMAn application event log entry...

So now I am a bit confused. What is the correct syslog message format ? It is a matter of spec version where RFC 5424 obsoleted RFC 3164 ?

Answer

b0ti picture b0ti · Feb 9, 2012

The problem in this case is that apache is logging via the standard syslog(3) or via logger. This only supports the old (RFC3164) syslog format, i.e. there is no structured data here. In order to have the fields from the apache log show up as RFC5424 structured data, apache would need to format the log that way.

The first example is not proper RFC3164 syslog, because the priority value is stripped from the header. Proper RFC3164 format would look like this:

<34>Jan 12 06:30:00 1.2.3.4 apache_server: 1.2.3.4 - - [12/Jan/2011:06:29:59 +0100] "GET /foo/bar.html HTTP/1.1" 301 96 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)" PID 18904 Time Taken 0

Traditionally rfc3164 syslog messages are saved to files with the priority value removed.

The other two are in RFC5424 format.