Extend existing protocols to implement another protocol with default implements

Avner Barr picture Avner Barr · May 19, 2016 · Viewed 15.9k times · Source

Is it possible to add protocol compliance to a different protocol by way of an extension?

For instance we would like A to comply with B:

protocol A {
  var a : UIView {get}
}

protocol B {
  var b : UIView {get}
}

I want to give a default implementation (compliance) of B to objects of type A

// This isn't possible
extension A : B {
  var b : UIView {
    return self.a
  }
}

The motivation being to reuse objects of A in cases where a B is required without creating my own "bridge"

class MyClass {
  func myFunc(object : A) {
    ...
    ...
    let view = object.a 
    ... do something with view ...

    myFunc(object)      // would like to use an 'A' without creating a 'B'
  }

  func myFunc2(object : B) {
    ...
    ...
    let view = object.b
    ... do something with view ...

  }
}

As a side note we can extend a class to implement a protocol

class C {
  let C : UIView
}

// this will work
extension C : B {
  var B : UIView {
    return self.c
  }
}

and protocols can give default implementations

extension A {
  // a default implementation
  var a : UIView {
     return UIView()
  }
}

Answer

ABakerSmith picture ABakerSmith · May 20, 2016

When extending A, you could specify that the type also conforms to B:

extension A where Self: B {
    var b : UIView {
        return self.a
    }
}

Then make your type conform to A and B, e.g.

struct MyStruct : A, B {
    var a : UIView {
        return UIView()
    }
}

Due to the protocol extension, instances of MyStruct will be able to use a and b, even though only a was implemented in MyStruct:

let obj = MyStruct()
obj.a
obj.b