I'm (thoroughly) learning SQL at the moment and came across the GROUP BY
clause.
GROUP BY
aggregates or groups the resultset according to the argument(s) you give it. If you use this clause in a query you can then perform aggregate functions on the resultset to find statistical information on the resultset like finding averages (AVG())
or frequency (COUNT())
.
My question is: is the GROUP BY statement in any way useful without an accompanying aggregate function?
Update
Using GROUP BY
as a synonym for DISTINCT
is (probably) a bad idea because I suspect it is slower.
is the GROUP BY statement in any way useful without an accompanying aggregate function?
Using DISTINCT
would be a synonym in such a situation, but the reason you'd want/have to define a GROUP BY
clause would be in order to be able to define HAVING
clause details.
If you need to define a HAVING
clause, you have to define a GROUP BY
- you can't do it in conjunction with DISTINCT
.