Possible Duplicate:
T-SQL WHERE col IN (…)
What is the maximum size for a SQL Server query? (# of characters)
Max size for an IN clause? I think I saw something about Oracle having a 1000 item limit but you could get around this with ANDing 2 INs together. Similar issue in SQL Server?
UPDATE So what would be the best approach if I need to take say 1000 GUIDs from another system (Non Relational Database) and do a "JOIN in code' against the SQL Server? Is it to submit the list of 1000 GUIDs to an IN clause? Or is there another technique that works more efficiently?
I haven't tested this but I wonder if I could submit the GUIDs as an XML doc. For example
<guids>
<guid>809674df-1c22-46eb-bf9a-33dc78beb44a</guid>
<guid>257f537f-9c6b-4f14-a90c-ee613b4287f3</guid>
</guids>
and then do some kind of XQuery JOIN against the Doc and the Table. Less efficient than 1000 item IN clause?
Every SQL batch has to fit in the Batch Size Limit: 65,536 * Network Packet Size.
Other than that, your query is limited by runtime conditions. It will usually run out of stack size because x IN (a,b,c) is nothing but x=a OR x=b OR x=c which creates an expression tree similar to x=a OR (x=b OR (x=c)), so it gets very deep with a large number of OR. SQL 7 would hit a SO at about 10k values in the IN, but nowdays stacks are much deeper (because of x64), so it can go pretty deep.
Update
You already found Erland's article on the topic of passing lists/arrays to SQL Server. With SQL 2008 you also have Table Valued Parameters which allow you to pass an entire DataTable as a single table type parameter and join on it.
XML and XPath is another viable solution:
SELECT ...
FROM Table
JOIN (
SELECT x.value(N'.',N'uniqueidentifier') as guid
FROM @values.nodes(N'/guids/guid') t(x)) as guids
ON Table.guid = guids.guid;