I'm finding a way to aggregate strings from different rows into a single row. I'm looking to do this in many different places, so having a function to facilitate this would be nice. I've tried solutions using COALESCE
and FOR XML
, but they just don't cut it for me.
String aggregation would do something like this:
id | Name Result: id | Names
-- - ---- -- - -----
1 | Matt 1 | Matt, Rocks
1 | Rocks 2 | Stylus
2 | Stylus
I've taken a look at CLR-defined aggregate functions as a replacement for COALESCE
and FOR XML
, but apparently SQL Azure does not support CLR-defined stuff, which is a pain for me because I know being able to use it would solve a whole lot of problems for me.
Is there any possible workaround, or similarly optimal method (which might not be as optimal as CLR, but hey I'll take what I can get) that I can use to aggregate my stuff?
SOLUTION
The definition of optimal can vary, but here's how to concatenate strings from different rows using regular Transact SQL, which should work fine in Azure.
;WITH Partitioned AS
(
SELECT
ID,
Name,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY ID ORDER BY Name) AS NameNumber,
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY ID) AS NameCount
FROM dbo.SourceTable
),
Concatenated AS
(
SELECT
ID,
CAST(Name AS nvarchar) AS FullName,
Name,
NameNumber,
NameCount
FROM Partitioned
WHERE NameNumber = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT
P.ID,
CAST(C.FullName + ', ' + P.Name AS nvarchar),
P.Name,
P.NameNumber,
P.NameCount
FROM Partitioned AS P
INNER JOIN Concatenated AS C
ON P.ID = C.ID
AND P.NameNumber = C.NameNumber + 1
)
SELECT
ID,
FullName
FROM Concatenated
WHERE NameNumber = NameCount
EXPLANATION
The approach boils down to three steps:
Number the rows using OVER
and PARTITION
grouping and ordering them as needed for the concatenation. The result is Partitioned
CTE. We keep counts of rows in each partition to filter the results later.
Using recursive CTE (Concatenated
) iterate through the row numbers (NameNumber
column) adding Name
values to FullName
column.
Filter out all results but the ones with the highest NameNumber
.
Please keep in mind that in order to make this query predictable one has to define both grouping (for example, in your scenario rows with the same ID
are concatenated) and sorting (I assumed that you simply sort the string alphabetically before concatenation).
I've quickly tested the solution on SQL Server 2012 with the following data:
INSERT dbo.SourceTable (ID, Name)
VALUES
(1, 'Matt'),
(1, 'Rocks'),
(2, 'Stylus'),
(3, 'Foo'),
(3, 'Bar'),
(3, 'Baz')
The query result:
ID FullName
----------- ------------------------------
2 Stylus
3 Bar, Baz, Foo
1 Matt, Rocks