I've been using GROUP BY
for all types of aggregate queries over the years. Recently, I've been reverse-engineering some code that uses PARTITION BY
to perform aggregations. In reading through all the documentation I can find about PARTITION BY
, it sounds a lot like GROUP BY
, maybe with a little extra functionality added in? Are they two versions of the same general functionality, or are they something different entirely?
They're used in different places. group by
modifies the entire query, like:
select customerId, count(*) as orderCount
from Orders
group by customerId
But partition by
just works on a window function, like row_number
:
select row_number() over (partition by customerId order by orderId)
as OrderNumberForThisCustomer
from Orders
A group by
normally reduces the number of rows returned by rolling them up and calculating averages or sums for each row. partition by
does not affect the number of rows returned, but it changes how a window function's result is calculated.