I am working on a view, wherein I am using an inner join on two tables which are from two different servers. We are using linked server. When running the query I am getting this message:
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Arabic_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
I don't know much about collation. Searching through internet I find solutions to use COLLATE
, but the concept of COLLATE
is not clear to me. Will it change anything for any of the databases? I am looking for a solution without changing anything for the databases.
Any good learning material for these concepts is welcome.
You can resolve the issue by forcing the collation used in a query to be a particular collation, e.g. SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
or DATABASE_DEFAULT
. For example:
SELECT MyColumn
FROM FirstTable a
INNER JOIN SecondTable b
ON a.MyID COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS =
b.YourID COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
In the above query, a.MyID and b.YourID would be columns with a text-based data type. Using COLLATE
will force the query to ignore the default collation on the database and instead use the provided collation, in this case SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
.
Basically what's going on here is that each database has its own collation which "provides sorting rules, case, and accent sensitivity properties for your data" (from http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143726.aspx) and applies to columns with textual data types, e.g. VARCHAR
, CHAR
, NVARCHAR
, etc. When two databases have differing collations, you cannot compare text columns with an operator like equals (=) without addressing the conflict between the two disparate collations.