While implementing, I came across a problem with Spring Cache Abstraction VS interfaces. Lets say I have the following interface:
package com.example.cache;
public interface IAddItMethod
{
Integer addIt(String key);
}
And the two following implementations:
package com.example.cache;
import org.springframework.cache.annotation.Cacheable;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class MethodImplOne implements IAddItMethod
{
@Override
@Cacheable(value="integersPlusOne", key="#keyOne")
public Integer addIt(String keyOne)
{
return new Integer(Integer.parseInt(keyOne) + 1);
}
}
.
package com.example.cache;
import org.springframework.cache.annotation.Cacheable;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class MethodImplTwo implements IAddItMethod
{
@Override
@Cacheable(value="integersPlusTwo", key="#keyTwo")
public Integer addIt(String keyTwo)
{
return new Integer(Integer.parseInt(keyTwo) + 2);
}
}
Note that the IAddItMethod is not the one specifying @Cacheable. We could have other implementation (ex MethodImplThree) without the @Cacheable annotation.
We’ve got a simple beans.xml with:
context:component-scan base-package="com.example.cache"
Adding to that, two jUnit test cases:
package com.example.cache;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Qualifier;
import org.springframework.test.context.ContextConfiguration;
import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner;
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(locations = {"classpath:beans.xml"})
public class MethodImplOneTest
{
@Autowired
@Qualifier("methodImplOne")
private IAddItMethod classUnderTest;
@Test
public void testInit()
{
int number = 1;
assertEquals(new Integer(number + 1), classUnderTest.addIt("" + number));
}
}
.
package com.example.cache;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Qualifier;
import org.springframework.test.context.ContextConfiguration;
import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner;
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(locations = {"classpath:beans.xml"})
public class MethodImplTwoTest
{
@Autowired
@Qualifier("methodImplTwo")
private IAddItMethod classUnderTest;
@Test
public void testInit()
{
int number = 1;
assertEquals(new Integer(number + 2), classUnderTest.addIt("" + number));
}
}
When I run the tests individually, they succeed. However, if I run them both together (selecting the package, right-click, run as), the second one (not necessarily MethodImplTwoTest, just the second one running) will fail with the following exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Null key returned for cache operation (maybe you are using named params on classes without debug info?) CacheableOperation[public java.lang.Integer com.example.cache.MethodImplOne.addIt(java.lang.String)] caches=[integersPlusOne] | condition='' | key='#keyOne' at org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheAspectSupport.inspectCacheables(CacheAspectSupport.java:297) at org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheAspectSupport.execute(CacheAspectSupport.java:198) at org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheInterceptor.invoke(CacheInterceptor.java:66) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:202) at $Proxy16.addIt(Unknown Source) at com.example.cache.ITMethodImplOneIntegrationTest.testInit(ITMethodImplOneIntegrationTest.java:26) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunBeforeTestMethodCallbacks.evaluate(RunBeforeTestMethodCallbacks.java:74) at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunAfterTestMethodCallbacks.evaluate(RunAfterTestMethodCallbacks.java:83) at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.SpringRepeat.evaluate(SpringRepeat.java:72) at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:231) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222) at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunBeforeTestClassCallbacks.evaluate(RunBeforeTestClassCallbacks.java:61) at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunAfterTestClassCallbacks.evaluate(RunAfterTestClassCallbacks.java:71) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300) at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.run(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:174) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
note: I'm using Eclipse STS 3.0 and the "Add variable attributes to generated class files" is enabled.
IMPORTANT: If I don't specify the "key" in the @Cacheable annotations, it works.
Is there anything I forgot to specify? config? annotations?
Thanks in advance!
My guess is that for jdk proxy the parameter name is fetched from the interface method so it's key
and not keyTwo
.
update: You can try to use parameter indexes instead
If for some reason the names are not available (ex: no debug information), the parameter names are also available under the p<#arg> where #arg stands for the parameter index (starting from 0).