I wish to have a go routine listening on two channels, blocked when both channels are drained. However, if both channels contains data, I want one to be drained before the other is handled.
In the working example below I wish all out
to be drained before exit
is handled. I use a select
-statement which doesn't have any priority order. How might I get around the problem, making all 10 out-values be handled before the exit?
package main
import "fmt"
func sender(out chan int, exit chan bool){
for i := 1; i <= 10; i++ {
out <- i
}
exit <- true
}
func main(){
out := make(chan int, 10)
exit := make(chan bool)
go sender(out, exit)
L:
for {
select {
case i := <-out:
fmt.Printf("Value: %d\n", i)
case <-exit:
fmt.Println("Exiting")
break L
}
}
fmt.Println("Did we get all 10? Most likely not")
}
The language supports this natively and no workaround is required. It's very simple: the quit channel should only be visible to the producer. On quit, the producer closes the channel. Only when the channel is empty and closed does the consumer quit. This is made possible by ranging over the channel.
Here is an example to illustrate:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"math/rand"
"time"
)
var (
produced = 0
processed = 0
)
func produceEndlessly(out chan int, quit chan bool) {
defer close(out)
for {
select {
case <-quit:
fmt.Println("RECV QUIT")
return
default:
out <- rand.Int()
time.Sleep(time.Duration(rand.Int63n(5e6)))
produced++
}
}
}
func quitRandomly(quit chan bool) {
d := time.Duration(rand.Int63n(5e9))
fmt.Println("SLEEP", d)
time.Sleep(d)
fmt.Println("SEND QUIT")
quit <- true
}
func main() {
vals, quit := make(chan int, 10), make(chan bool)
go produceEndlessly(vals, quit)
go quitRandomly(quit)
for x := range vals {
fmt.Println(x)
processed++
time.Sleep(time.Duration(rand.Int63n(5e8)))
}
fmt.Println("Produced:", produced)
fmt.Println("Processed:", processed)
}