I have problem with an SD card. I'm using the FatFs library ver R0.10b to access the SD card.
My code:
// .... //
FATFS fatfs;
FIL plik;
FRESULT fresult,res1,res2,res3,res4,res5;
UINT zapisanych_bajtow = 0 , br;
UINT zapianie_bajtow = 0;
char * buffor = "123456789abcdef\r\n";
unsigned short int i;
void main(void) {
// ... //
res1 = f_mount(0,&fatfs); // returns FA_OK
res2 = f_open( &plik, "f721.txt", FA_OPEN_ALWAYS | FA_WRITE ); // returns FA_OK
if( res2 == FR_OK )
{
res3 = f_write( &plik, ( const void * ) buffor, 17, &zapisanych_bajtow ); // returns FR_DISK_ERR
}
res4 = f_close( &plik );// returns FR_DISK_ERR
for(;;)
{
}
}
Any idea what might be wrong?
I had similar error with just one difference. I tried to write 4096bytes with f_write function at once. And it always returned FR_DISK_ERR. And this was caused because I tried to write more then is size of IO buffer in FIL structure in FatFS (defined in ff.h).
typedef struct {
FATFS* fs; /* Pointer to the related file system object (**do not change order**) */
WORD id; /* Owner file system mount ID (**do not change order**) */
BYTE flag; /* Status flags */
BYTE err; /* Abort flag (error code) */
DWORD fptr; /* File read/write pointer (Zeroed on file open) */
DWORD fsize; /* File size */
DWORD sclust; /* File start cluster (0:no cluster chain, always 0 when fsize is 0) */
DWORD clust; /* Current cluster of fpter (not valid when fprt is 0) */
DWORD dsect; /* Sector number appearing in buf[] (0:invalid) */
DWORD dir_sect; /* Sector number containing the directory entry */
BYTE* dir_ptr; /* Pointer to the directory entry in the win[] */
DWORD* cltbl; /* Pointer to the cluster link map table (Nulled on file open) */
UINT lockid; /* File lock ID origin from 1 (index of file semaphore table Files[]) */
BYTE buf[_MAX_SS]; /* File private data read/write window */
} FIL;
The last array buf[_MAX_SS] is the file IO buffer. But _MAX_SS is user defined parameter (defined in ff.h) so you can decrease the amount of bytes written at once or eventually change the _MAX_SS value.
I know this is not your case because you only write 17 bytes at once, but this can be helpful for others.