comparing sbt and Gradle
I am diving into Scala and noticed sbt. I have been quite happy with Gradle in java/groovy projects, and I know there's a scala plugin for Gradle.
What could be good reasons to favour sbt over Gradle in a Scala project?
Answer
Note that one key difference between SBT and Gradle is its dependency management:
- SBT: Ivy, with a a revision which can be given as a fixed one (1.5.2, for instance) or as latest (or dynamic) one.
See "Ivy Dependency"
That means the "-SNAPSHOT" mechanism support can be problematic, even though Mark Harrah details in this thread:
It is true the cache can get confused, but it is not true that Ivy doesn't understand resolving snapshots. Eugene explained this point in another thread, perhaps on the admin list. There is an issue with sbt's auto-update that was addressed in 0.12.
What Ivy does not support, as far as I know, is publishing snapshots in the manner Maven does. I believe I have stated this elsewhere, but if anyone wants to improve the situation, my opinion is that effort is best spent working with the Gradle team to reuse their dependency management code.
- Gradle: This thread mentions (Peter Niederwieser):
Just to let you know, problems with Ivy and Maven snapshot dependencies were one of the reasons why Gradle eventually replaced Ivy with its own dependency management code. It was a big task, but brought us a lot of goodness.
This tweet mentions that the all situation could evolve in the future:
Mark said in the past that he was interested in using Gradle instead of Ivy for SBT.
(both tools can learn from each other)