Resque vs Sidekiq?

Bhushan Lodha picture Bhushan Lodha · Jul 20, 2012 · Viewed 41.1k times · Source

I am currently using Resque for my background process but recently I heard a lot of huff-buff about sidekiq. Could anybody compare/differentiate?

In particular I would like to know is there a way to monitor programmatically whether a job is completed in sidekiq

Answer

Sergio Tulentsev picture Sergio Tulentsev · Jul 20, 2012

Resque:

Pros:

Cons

  • runs a process per worker (uses more memory);
  • does not retry jobs (out of the box, anyway).

Sidekiq:

Pros

  • runs thread per worker (uses much less memory);
  • less forking (works faster);
  • more options out of the box.

Cons

  • [huge] requires thread-safety of your code and all dependencies. If you run thread-unsafe code with threads, you're asking for trouble;
  • works on some rubies better than others (jruby is recommended, efficiency on MRI is decreased due to GVL (global VM lock)).