Ruby on Rails: errors.add_to_base vs. errors.add

ruby-on-rails ruby validation model
Tony picture Tony · Apr 1, 2009 · Viewed 64.8k times · Source

I have read that errors.add_to_base should be used for errors associated with the object and not a specific attribute. I am having trouble conceptualizing what this means. Could someone provide an example of when I would want to use each?

For example, I have a Band model and each Band has a Genre. When I validate the presence of a genre, if the genre is missing should the error be added to the base?

The more examples the better

Thank you!

Answer

GSP picture GSP · Dec 5, 2012

It's worth noting (since this shows up in the search engines, which is how I found it) that this is deprecated. The Rails 3 way of doing it is:

errors[:base] << "Error message"

or 

errors.add(:base, "Error message")

http://apidock.com/rails/ActiveRecord/Errors/add_to_base
http://apidock.com/rails/v3.2.8/ActiveModel/Errors/add

Related questions

Rails: Validating min and max length of a string but allowing it to be blank

I have a field that I would like to validate. I want the field to be able to be left blank, but if a user is entering data I want it to be in a certain format. Currently I am …

Read More
How do I validate a date in rails?

I want to validate a date in my model in Ruby on Rails, however, the day, month and year values are already converted into an incorrect date by the time they reach my model. For example, if I enter February 31…

Read More
Rails: What's a good way to validate links (URLs)?

I was wondering how I would best validate URLs in Rails. I was thinking of using a regular expression, but am not sure if this is the best practice. And, if I were to use a regex, could someone suggest …

Read More