Why to use __setattr__ in python?

python setter
user278618 picture user278618 · Apr 22, 2011 · Viewed 32.7k times · Source

I don't know for why using __setattr__ instead simple referencing like x.a=1.

I understand this example:

class Rectangle:
    def __init__(self):
        self.width = 0
        self.height = 0


x=Rectangle()
x.width=20
x.__setattr__('height',30)
setattr(x,'width',99)

but don't get why using code depending on string ('height').

Could you explain me what are advantages of __setattr__ ?

Answer

user395760 picture user395760 · Apr 22, 2011

You don't call it yourself. Period. If you need to use a string because you don't know the name beforehand (very bad idea in 99% of all cases where one might think they need this, nearly always a dict or list is a better/saner choice), you use the built-in setattr function.

However, it is called for you - when you do a.x = ..., that's done as a.__setattr__('x', ...) (this is propably an oversimplification). And some objects overload it to allow some trickery, e.g. to emulate immutability. See the documentation of "special methods".

Related questions

Property setter with multiple values

I have a property setter which generates a unique id by taking two strings and hashing it: @id.setter def id(self,value1,value2): self._id = sha512(value1+value2) I have two questions: Is it allowed (considering good python coding …

Read More
Using @property decorator on dicts

I'm trying to use Python's @property decorator on a dict in a class. The idea is that I want a certain value (call it 'message') to be cleared after it is accessed. But I also want another value (call it …

Read More
Python: multiple properties, one setter/getter

Consider the following class definitions class of2010(object): def __init__(self): self._a = 1 self._b = 2 self._c = 3 def set_a(self,value): print('setting a...') self._a = value def set_b(self,value): print('setting b...') self._b = …

Read More