I'm implementing a REST-style interface and would like to be able to create (via upload) files via a HTTP PUT request. I would like to create either a TemporaryUploadedFile
or a InMemoryUploadedFile
which I can then pass to my existing FileField
and .save()
on the object that is part of the model, thereby storing the file.
I'm not quite sure about how to handle the file upload part. Specifically, this being a put request, I do not have access to request.FILES
since it does not exist in a PUT
request.
So, some questions:
HttpRequest
class, specifically the part that handles file uploads? I know a direct PUT
is not a multipart MIME request, so I don't think so, but it is worth asking.TemporaryUploadFile
and related code does - write it part at a time?I've taken a look at this code sample which tricks Django into handling PUT
as a POST
request. If I've got it right though, it'll only handle form encoded data. This is REST, so the best solution would be to not assume form encoded data will exist. However, I'm happy to hear appropriate advice on using mime (not multipart) somehow (but the upload should only contain a single file).
Django 1.3 is acceptable. So I can either do something with request.raw_post_data
or request.read()
(or alternatively some other better method of access). Any ideas?
Django 1.3 is acceptable. So I can either do something with request.raw_post_data or request.read() (or alternatively some other better method of access). Any ideas?
You don't want to be touching request.raw_post_data
- that implies reading the entire request body into memory, which if you're talking about file uploads might be a very large amount, so request.read()
is the way to go. You can do this with Django <= 1.2 as well, but it means digging around in HttpRequest
to figure out the the right way to use the private interfaces, and it's a real drag to then ensure your code will also be compatible with Django >= 1.3.
I'd suggest that what you want to do is to replicate the existing file upload behaviour parts of the MultiPartParser
class:
request.upload_handlers
(Which by default will be MemoryFileUploadHandler
& TemporaryFileUploadHandler
)HttpRequest
or MultiPartParser
to see the right way to do this.)Content-Disposition
header.handler.new_file
with the relevant args (mocking up a field name)request.read()
and calling handler.receive_data_chunk()
for each chunk.handler.file_complete()
, and if it returns a value, that's the uploaded file.How can I deduce the mime type of what is being sent? If I've got it right, a PUT body is simply the file without prelude. Do I therefore require that the user specify the mime type in their headers?
Either let the client specify it in the Content-Type header, or use python's mimetype module to guess the media type.
I'd be interested to find out how you get on with this - it's something I've been meaning to look into myself, be great if you could comment to let me know how it goes!
Edit by Ninefingers as requested, this is what I did and is based entirely on the above and the django source.
upload_handlers = request.upload_handlers
content_type = str(request.META.get('CONTENT_TYPE', ""))
content_length = int(request.META.get('CONTENT_LENGTH', 0))
if content_type == "":
return HttpResponse(status=400)
if content_length == 0:
# both returned 0
return HttpResponse(status=400)
content_type = content_type.split(";")[0].strip()
try:
charset = content_type.split(";")[1].strip()
except IndexError:
charset = ""
# we can get the file name via the path, we don't actually
file_name = path.split("/")[-1:][0]
field_name = file_name
Since I'm defining the API here, cross browser support isn't a concern. As far as my protocol is concerned, not supplying the correct information is a broken request. I'm in two minds as to whether I want say image/jpeg; charset=binary
or if I'm going to allow non-existent charsets. In any case, I'm putting setting Content-Type
validly as a client-side responsibility.
Similarly, for my protocol, the file name is passed in. I'm not sure what the field_name
parameter is for and the source didn't give many clues.
What happens below is actually much simpler than it looks. You ask each handler if it will handle the raw input. As the author of the above states, you've got MemoryFileUploadHandler
& TemporaryFileUploadHandler
by default. Well, it turns out MemoryFileUploadHandler
will when asked to create a new_file
decide whether it will or not handle the file (based on various settings). If it decides it's going to, it throws an exception, otherwise it won't create the file and lets another handler take over.
I'm not sure what the purpose of counters
was, but I've kept it from the source. The rest should be straightforward.
counters = [0]*len(upload_handlers)
for handler in upload_handlers:
result = handler.handle_raw_input("",request.META,content_length,"","")
for handler in upload_handlers:
try:
handler.new_file(field_name, file_name,
content_type, content_length, charset)
except StopFutureHandlers:
break
for i, handler in enumerate(upload_handlers):
while True:
chunk = request.read(handler.chunk_size)
if chunk:
handler.receive_data_chunk(chunk, counters[i])
counters[i] += len(chunk)
else:
# no chunk
break
for i, handler in enumerate(upload_handlers):
file_obj = handler.file_complete(counters[i])
if not file_obj:
# some indication this didn't work?
return HttpResponse(status=500)
else:
# handle file obj!