I have the following pandas dataframe Top15
:
I create a column that estimates the number of citable documents per person:
Top15['PopEst'] = Top15['Energy Supply'] / Top15['Energy Supply per Capita']
Top15['Citable docs per Capita'] = Top15['Citable documents'] / Top15['PopEst']
I want to know the correlation between the number of citable documents per capita and the energy supply per capita. So I use the .corr()
method (Pearson's correlation):
data = Top15[['Citable docs per Capita','Energy Supply per Capita']]
correlation = data.corr(method='pearson')
I want to return a single number, but the result is:
Without actual data it is hard to answer the question but I guess you are looking for something like this:
Top15['Citable docs per Capita'].corr(Top15['Energy Supply per Capita'])
That calculates the correlation between your two columns 'Citable docs per Capita'
and 'Energy Supply per Capita'
.
To give an example:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': range(4), 'B': [2*i for i in range(4)]})
A B
0 0 0
1 1 2
2 2 4
3 3 6
Then
df['A'].corr(df['B'])
gives 1
as expected.
Now, if you change a value, e.g.
df.loc[2, 'B'] = 4.5
A B
0 0 0.0
1 1 2.0
2 2 4.5
3 3 6.0
the command
df['A'].corr(df['B'])
returns
0.99586
which is still close to 1, as expected.
If you apply .corr
directly to your dataframe, it will return all pairwise correlations between your columns; that's why you then observe 1s
at the diagonal of your matrix (each column is perfectly correlated with itself).
df.corr()
will therefore return
A B
A 1.000000 0.995862
B 0.995862 1.000000
In the graphic you show, only the upper left corner of the correlation matrix is represented (I assume).
There can be cases, where you get NaN
s in your solution - check this post for an example.
If you want to filter entries above/below a certain threshold, you can check this question. If you want to plot a heatmap of the correlation coefficients, you can check this answer and if you then run into the issue with overlapping axis-labels check the following post.