I'm writing a python script that uses subprocess.Popen to execute two programs (from compiled C code) which each produce stdout. The script gets that output and saves it to a file. Because the output is sometimes large enough to overwhelm subprocess.PIPE, causing the script to hang, I send the stdout directly to the log file. I want to have my script write something to the beginning and end of the file, and between the two subprocess.Popen calls. However, when I look at my log file, anything I wrote to the log file from the script is all together at the top of the file, followed by all the executable stdout. How can I interleave my added text to the file?
def run(cmd, logfile):
p = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True, universal_newlines=True, stdout=logfile)
return p
def runTest(path, flags, name):
log = open(name, "w")
print >> log, "Calling executable A"
a_ret = run(path + "executable_a_name" + flags, log)
print >> log, "Calling executable B"
b_ret = run(path + "executable_b_name" + flags, log)
print >> log, "More stuff"
log.close()
The log file has: Calling executable A Calling executable B More stuff [... stdout from both executables ...]
Is there a way I can flush A's stdout to the log after calling Popen, for example? One more thing that might be relevant: Executable A starts then pends on B, and after B prints stuff and finishes, A then prints more stuff and finishes.
I'm using Python 2.4 on RHE Linux.
You could call .wait() on each Popen object in order to be sure that it's finished and then call log.flush(). Maybe something like this:
def run(cmd, logfile):
p = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True, universal_newlines=True, stdout=logfile)
ret_code = p.wait()
logfile.flush()
return ret_code
If you need to interact with the Popen object in your outer function you could move the .wait() call to there instead.