I need to create a symlink for every item of dir1 (file or directory) inside dir2. dir2 already exists and is not a symlink. In Bash I can easily achieve this by:
ln -s /home/guest/dir1/* /home/guest/dir2/
But in python using os.symlink
I get an error:
>>> os.symlink('/home/guest/dir1/*', '/home/guest/dir2/')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
OSError: [Errno 17] File exist
I know I can use subprocess
and run ln
command. I don't want that solution.
I'm also aware that workarounds using os.walk
or glob.glob
are possible, but I want to know if it is possible to do this using os.symlink
.
os.symlink
creates a single symlink.
ln -s
creates multiple symlinks (if its last argument is a directory, and there's more than one source). The Python equivalent is something like:
dst = args[-1]
for src in args[:-1]:
os.symlink(src, os.path.join(dst, os.path.dirname(src)))
So, how does it work when you do ln -s /home/guest/dir1/* /home/guest/dir2/
? Your shell makes that work, by turning the wildcard into multiple arguments. If you were to just exec
the ln
command with a wildcard, it would look for a single source literally named *
in /home/guest/dir1/
, not all files in that directory.
The Python equivalent is something like (if you don't mind mixing two levels together and ignoring a lot of other cases—tildes, env variables, command substitution, etc. that are possible at the shell):
dst = args[-1]
for srcglob in args[:-1]:
for src in glob.glob(srcglob):
os.symlink(src, os.path.join(dst, os.path.dirname(src)))
You can't do that with os.symlink
alone—either part of it—because it doesn't do that. It's like saying "I want to do the equivalent of find . -name foo
using os.walk
without filtering on the name." Or, for that matter, I want to do the equivalent of ln -s /home/guest/dir1/* /home/guest/dir2/
without the shell globbing for me."
The right answer is to use glob
, or fnmatch
, or os.listdir
plus a regex, or whatever you prefer.
Do not use os.walk
, because that does a recursive filesystem walk, so it's not even close to shell *
expansion.