Let's say you have a method or a cmdlet that returns something, but you don't want to use it and you don't want to output it. I found these two ways:
Add-Item > $null
[void]Add-Item
Add-Item | Out-Null
What do you use? Which is the better/cleaner approach? Why?
I just did some tests of the four options that I know about.
Measure-Command {$(1..1000) | Out-Null}
TotalMilliseconds : 76.211
Measure-Command {[Void]$(1..1000)}
TotalMilliseconds : 0.217
Measure-Command {$(1..1000) > $null}
TotalMilliseconds : 0.2478
Measure-Command {$null = $(1..1000)}
TotalMilliseconds : 0.2122
## Control, times vary from 0.21 to 0.24
Measure-Command {$(1..1000)}
TotalMilliseconds : 0.2141
So I would suggest that you use anything but Out-Null
due to overhead. The next important thing, to me, would be readability. I kind of like redirecting to $null
and setting equal to $null
myself. I use to prefer casting to [Void]
, but that may not be as understandable when glancing at code or for new users.
I guess I slightly prefer redirecting output to $null
.
Do-Something > $null
Edit
After stej's comment again, I decided to do some more tests with pipelines to better isolate the overhead of trashing the output.
Here are some tests with a simple 1000 object pipeline.
## Control Pipeline
Measure-Command {$(1..1000) | ?{$_ -is [int]}}
TotalMilliseconds : 119.3823
## Out-Null
Measure-Command {$(1..1000) | ?{$_ -is [int]} | Out-Null}
TotalMilliseconds : 190.2193
## Redirect to $null
Measure-Command {$(1..1000) | ?{$_ -is [int]} > $null}
TotalMilliseconds : 119.7923
In this case, Out-Null
has about a 60% overhead and > $null
has about a 0.3% overhead.
Addendum 2017-10-16: I originally overlooked another option with Out-Null
, the use of the -inputObject
parameter. Using this the overhead seems to disappear, however the syntax is different:
Out-Null -inputObject ($(1..1000) | ?{$_ -is [int]})
And now for some tests with a simple 100 object pipeline.
## Control Pipeline
Measure-Command {$(1..100) | ?{$_ -is [int]}}
TotalMilliseconds : 12.3566
## Out-Null
Measure-Command {$(1..100) | ?{$_ -is [int]} | Out-Null}
TotalMilliseconds : 19.7357
## Redirect to $null
Measure-Command {$(1..1000) | ?{$_ -is [int]} > $null}
TotalMilliseconds : 12.8527
Here again Out-Null
has about a 60% overhead. While > $null
has an overhead of about 4%. The numbers here varied a bit from test to test (I ran each about 5 times and picked the middle ground). But I think it shows a clear reason to not use Out-Null
.