Using MySQL's TIMESTAMP vs storing timestamps directly

siliconpi picture siliconpi · Aug 11, 2011 · Viewed 27.6k times · Source

I'm in a dilemma about saving date and time values in MySQL's TIMESTAMP format vs in a custom UNSIGNED INT format. The main considerations here are speed of retrieval, appropriate range calculations in PHP and occasional formatting into human readable values.

The storage space required for each type and their ranges:

DATETIME        8 bytes  '1000-01-01 00:00:00' to '9999-12-31 23:59:59'
TIMESTAMP       4 bytes  '1970-01-01 00:00:01' UTC to '2038-01-19 03:14:07' UTC
UNSIGNED INT    4 bytes  (Maximum Value 4294967295)

I dont need the range of DATETIME at all. I'm torn between TIMESTAMP and UNSIGNED INT.

Arguments in favor of UNSIGNED INT:

  • A UNIX timestamp of 4294967295 converts to Sun, 07 Feb 2106 06:28:15 GMT which is more than TIMESTAMP and good enough for me
  • Comparing these timestamps directly in PHP would be faster rather than converting TIMESTAMPs via strtotime() and then comparing them

The only advantage TIMESTAMP would give me is when I'm reading in the values from the mysql table manually and need to 'see' them.

Is there any compelling reason to use TIMESTAMP and not an UNSIGNED INT?

Answer

Mchl picture Mchl · Aug 11, 2011

Arguments for TIMESTAMP

  • It implicitly stores data in UTC time zone. No matter what your session time-zone is. Useful if you need to use different time zones.
  • You can have automated timestamping columns using DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP or ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP (one column per table only until MySQL 5.6.5)
  • You can use datetime function for date comparison, addition, subtraction, range lookup etc, without the need to use FROM_UNIXTIME() function - it will make it easier to write queries that can use indexes
  • In PHP

    >> date('Y-m-d h:i:s',4294967295);
    '1969-12-31 11:59:59'
    

    so the range is in fact the same

When UNIX_TIMESTAMP() is used on a TIMESTAMP column, the function returns the internal timestamp value directly, with no implicit “string-to-Unix-timestamp” conversion