I'm wondering what is the difference between using self:: and parent:: when a static child class is extending static parent class e.g.
class Parent {
public static function foo() {
echo 'foo';
}
}
class Child extends Parent {
public static function func() {
self::foo();
}
public static function func2() {
parent::foo();
}
}
Is there any difference between func() and func2() and if so then what is it ?
Thank you
Regards
Child has foo() Parent has foo()
self::foo() YES YES Child foo() is executed
parent::foo() YES YES Parent foo() is executed
self::foo() YES NO Child foo() is executed
parent::foo() YES NO ERROR
self::foo() NO YES Parent foo() is executed
parent::foo() NO YES Parent foo() is executed
self::foo() NO NO ERROR
parent::foo() NO NO ERROR
If you are looking for the correct cases for their use. parent
allows access to the inherited class, whereas self
is a reference to the class the method running (static or otherwise) belongs to.
A popular use of the self
keyword is when using the Singleton pattern in PHP, self
doesn't honour child classes, whereas static
does New self vs. new static
parent
provides the ability to access the inherited class methods, often useful if you need to retain some default functionality.