InvalidArgumentException vs UnexpectedValueException

Question

When should I use InvalidArgumentException and when UnexpectedValueException? They look the same to me.

Note that one extends LogicException and the other one extends RuntimeException, so the difference shouldn't be so subtle IMO.

Answer 1

Looking closely at the descriptions on the manual pages:

InvalidArgumentException

Exception thrown if an argument is not of the expected type.

_{(The description was Exception thrown if an argument does not match with the expected value. until mid-2014, but was changed when PHP 5.6 got introduced)}

UnexpectedValueException

Exception thrown if a value does not match with a set of values. Typically this happens when a function calls another function and expects the return value to be of a certain type or value[,] not including arithmetic or buffer related errors.

From this, we can conclude that InvalidArgumentException is intended to check types of arguments passed to a function, while UnexpectedValueException is intended to verify values vs valid value sets, possibly during the internal computations of a function (e.g. values returned from other functions).

Note that checking the values of arguments is kind of gray area here; arguably, since InvalidArgumentException extends LogicException, it should only handle situations which should lead directly to a fix in your code. Since throwing an exception in case of out-of-range input values can be a completely expected runtime behaviour, this leaves UnexpectedValueException (which extends RuntimeException) as the only candidate in such cases.