ext-all.js VS ext-all-debug.js

performance extjs extjs3
hop picture hop · Aug 14, 2011 · Viewed 11.5k times · Source

What is the difference between using ext-all.js and ext-all-debug.js?

Does changing to ext-all.js from debug.js improve performance?

Can I assume that switching from debug to normal file will not have any other impacts on the application?

Also, can any one suggest what ext-base.js do?

Answer

Eddy picture Eddy · Aug 14, 2011

Ext-all is basically the minified verion of the debug one. The gain is that it greatly reduces the files size so that clients have to download less. Ext-base are the core functions of ext. If you only use those you could just include that file instead of the huge complete set in ext-all.

On the ext site there used to be a custom js builder where you would pick just the functions you need and it would create a custom js for you with just those modules

Related questions

Which is better - Ext.get() or document.getElementById()

What is the difference between Ext.get() and document.getElementById() in terms of performance? Will Ext.get() be slower as it may internally call document.getElementById() ? Or is there any specific advantage of using Ext.get() ?

Read More
Measuring FPS/Performance in Xcode/Iphone

I am running a Sencha Touch application and I am wondering what the best way to measure my FPS while running my app on a device from Xcode? Specifically I have an infinitely scrolling facebook-like wall and I am trying …

Read More
Which "href" value should I use for JavaScript links, "#" or "javascript:void(0)"?

The following are two methods of building a link that has the sole purpose of running JavaScript code. Which is better, in terms of functionality, page load speed, validation purposes, etc.? or function myJsFunc() { alert("myJsFunc"); } <a href="javascript:…

Read More