Inode vs Vnode Difference
I had some doubts regarding an Inode vs a Vnode. As far as my understanding goes, inode is the representation of a file that is used by the Virtual File System. Whereas vnodes are file system specific. Is this correct?
Also, I am confused whether inode is a kernel data structure i.e whether it is an in-memory data structure or a data structure that exists on blocks in an actual disk?
Answer
To add something to this: The best explanation I could find for a vnode is here on the FreeBSD docs. For the more academically minded there is also the original paper that introduced the concept which provides a much more in depth resource.
That said vnodes were originally created for FreeBSD because of the proliferation of different types of filesystems that needed to be used like UFS, NFS, etc. Vnodes are meant to provide an abstraction across all possible filesystems so that the OS can interface with them and so that kernel functions don't have to specifically support every filesystem under the sun; they only have to have knowledge of how to interact with the file's vnode.
Back to your original question vnodes, as @Allen Luce mentioned, are in memory abstractions and are not filesystem specific. They can be used interchangeably in UFS, ext4, and whatever else. In contrast, inodes are stored on disk and are specific to the exact filesystem being used. inodes contain metadata about the file like size, owner, pointers to the block addresses among other things. Vnodes contain some data about the file but only attributes that do not change over the file's lifetime so an inode would be the location to reference if you wanted the most information possible about a file. If you're more interested in inodes I would suggest you check out wikipedia which has a good article on them.