In Go, does it make sense to write non-blocking code?
coming from node.js point of view, where all code is non-blocking.
In Go, non-blocking is easily achieved using channels.
if one were writing a node.js type server in go, does it make sense to make it non-blocking? for example, having a database connect() function return a channel, as versus blocking while waiting for the connection to occur.
to me, this seems the correct approach
but ...
Answer
Blocking and non-blocking aren't really about performance, they are about an interface. If you have a single thread of execution then a blocking call prevents your program from doing any useful work while it's waiting. But if you have multiple threads of execution a blocking call doesn't really matter because you can just leave that thread blocked and do useful work in another.
In Go, a goroutine is swapped out for another one when it blocks on I/O. The Go runtime uses non-blocking I/O syscalls to avoid the operating system blocking the thread so a different goroutine can be run on it while the first is waiting for it's I/O.
Goroutines are really cheap so writing non-blocking style code is not needed.