I have an InnoDB table that needs to be re-populated every ten minutes within anywhere from 60k to 200k records. Our approach up to this point has been as follows:
After the Truncate operation is performed though, the data is immediately deleted, and is no longer available from the User Interface. To our users, this has been pretty disconcerting, even though within about 30 seconds or so the script encounters the Commit operation and the table is repopulated.
I thought that perhaps I could wrap the whole operation, including the Truncate
, in a transaction, and that this might cut down on the length of time during which the table appears empty to users. So I changed SET AUTOCOMMIT=0
to START TRANSCATION
.
Yikes! This had the opposite of the desired effect! Now the TRUNCATE
operation still occurs at the beginning of the script, but it takes much longer to actually execute the INSERT
operations within the transaction, so that by the time the COMMIT
operation takes place and the data in the table is available again, it has been nearly ten minutes!
What could possibly cause this? Truthfully, I wasn't expecting any change at all, because I was under the impression that initiating a transaction basically just turns off Autocommit
anyway??
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/truncate-table.html
According to this URL, as of MySQL 5.1.32, TRUNCATE TABLE
is DDL and NOT DML like DELETE. This means that TRUNCATE TABLE
will cause an implicit COMMIT
in the middle of a transaction block. So, use DELETE FROM
on a table you need to empty instead of TRUNCATE TABLE
.
Even DELETE FROM tblname;
can be rolled back. It could take a while to rollback, so make sure InnoDB is properly tuned to handle the transaction time for such rollback possibilities.