Here is a gross oversimplification of an intense setup I am working with. table_1
and table_2
both have auto-increment surrogate primary keys as the ID. info
is a table that contains information about both table_1
and table_2
.
table_1 (id, field)
table_2 (id, field, field)
info ( ???, field)
I am trying to decided if I should make the primary key of info
a composite of the IDs from table_1
and table_2
. If I were to do this, which of these makes most sense?
( in this example I am combining ID 11209 with ID 437 )
INT(9)
11209437 (i can imagine why this is bad)
VARCHAR (10)
11209-437
DECIMAL (10,4)
11209.437
Or something else?
Would this be fine to use this as the Primary Key on a MYSQL MYISAM DB?
I would use a composite (multi-column) key.
CREATE TABLE INFO (
t1ID INT,
t2ID INT,
PRIMARY KEY (t1ID, t2ID)
)
This way you can have t1ID and t2ID as foreign keys pointing to their respective tables as well.