Which is fastest? SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS FROM `table`, or SELECT COUNT(*)

Jrgns picture Jrgns · Oct 9, 2008 · Viewed 131.5k times · Source

When you limit the number of rows to be returned by a SQL query, usually used in paging, there are two methods to determine the total number of records:

Method 1

Include the SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS option in the original SELECT, and then get the total number of rows by running SELECT FOUND_ROWS():

SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS * FROM table WHERE id > 100 LIMIT 10;
SELECT FOUND_ROWS();  

Method 2

Run the query normally, and then get the total number of rows by running SELECT COUNT(*)

SELECT * FROM table WHERE id > 100 LIMIT 10;
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table WHERE id > 100;  

Which method is the best / fastest?

Answer

nathan picture nathan · Oct 9, 2008

It depends. See the MySQL Performance Blog post on this subject: To SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS or not to SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS?

Just a quick summary: Peter says that it depends on your indexes and other factors. Many of the comments to the post seem to say that SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS is almost always slower - sometimes up to 10x slower - than running two queries.