I'm working on a event tracking system which uses a handful of lookup tables as well as the primary logging table. In a report I'm writing, an object can be selected to view statistics against. The interface shows all objects in order of decreasing importance (ie, hits).
The schema for the two tables (slightly trimmed down, but you get the gist):
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `event_log` (
`event_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`user_id` int(5) DEFAULT NULL,
`object_id` int(5) DEFAULT NULL,
`event_date` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`event_id`),
KEY `user_id` (`user_id`),
KEY `object_id` (`object_id`)
);
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `lookup_event_objects` (
`object_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`object_desc` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`object_id`)
);
The query I'm having trouble with is below. It works fine with my table of ~100 entries, but the EXPLAIN worries me a little.
explain SELECT
el.object_id,
leo.object_desc,
COUNT(el.object_id) as count_rows
FROM
event_log el
LEFT JOIN lookup_event_objects leo ON leo.object_id = el.object_id
GROUP BY
el.object_id
ORDER BY
count_rows DESC,
leo.object_desc ASC
Returns:
Using index; Using temporary; Using filesort
So -- what's wrong with my schema and/or query for MySQL to fall back on temporary
and filesort
? Or is it as optimized as it can get using ORDER BY?
Well, the doc gives the exact reasons when "Using temporary" will appear:
Temporary tables can be created under conditions such as these:
If there is an ORDER BY clause and a different GROUP BY clause, or if the ORDER BY or GROUP BY contains columns from tables other than the first table in the join queue, a temporary table is created.
DISTINCT combined with ORDER BY may require a temporary table.
If you use the SQL_SMALL_RESULT option, MySQL uses an in-memory temporary table, unless the query also contains elements (described later) that require on-disk storage.
A quick scan shows that you suffer from #1.
And this blog from 2009 says that "using filesort" means that the sort can't be performed with an index. Since you're ordering by a computed field, that's going to be true, too.
So, that's what's "wrong".