epoll_wait on several Threads faster?

multithreading epoll
Filipe Santos picture Filipe Santos · Sep 18, 2012 · Viewed 7.4k times · Source

I am thinking of programming a tcp server based on epoll. To achieve the best performance i want to implement multi core support too. But during my researches the following question came up: Is it faster to call two epoll_wait()-Calls from two different threads, each observing their own file descriptors on a dual core? Or is this as fast as calling just one single epoll_wait() which observes all file descriptors?

Since the Kernel observes the file descriptors, i think it doens't matter how much threads i use on user space calling epoll_wait()?

Answer

cmeerw picture cmeerw · Sep 18, 2012

You can even call epoll_wait concurrently on multiple threads for the same epoll_fd as long as you use edge-triggered (EPOLLET) mode (and be careful about synchronisation). Using that approach you can get real performance benefits on multi-core machines compared to a single-threaded epoll event loop.

I have actually done performance measurements some time ago, see my blog postings for the results:

Related questions

Is there epoll equivalent in Java?

Is there an equivalent of Linux epoll in Java? epoll allows a thread to react to a number of heterogenous events. For instance, I can have a thread that reacts to either a socket event or an input from the …

Read More
multithreaded epoll

I am creating a multithreaded server using epoll (edge-triggered) and non-blocking sockets. Currently I'm creating an event loop on the main thread and waiting for notifications and it works correctly I have to choose between two approaches to make it …

Read More
Is epoll thread-safe?

There are two functions in epoll: epoll_ctl epoll_wait Are they thread-safe when I use the same epoll_fd? What will happen if one thread calls epoll_wait and others call epoll_ctl at the same time?

Read More