find lacks the option -printf, now what?

macos find printf
Léo Léopold Hertz 준영 picture Léo Léopold Hertz 준영 · Apr 15, 2009 · Viewed 21.7k times · Source

I have not found a reason why Mac's find does not have the option -printf. Apple normally decides to take options out which are not orthogonal to the other commands?

How can you reach the same result as the following command in Mac without coreutils?

find . -printf "%i \n"         // command in Ubuntu

Answer

ephemient picture ephemient · Apr 15, 2009

It's not that Apple removes options, it's that OS X's UNIX underpinnings are mostly derived (circuitously) from FreeBSD, many parts of which can be traced back to the original UNIX... as opposed to the GNU utilities, which are re-implementations with many features added.

In this case, FreeBSD's find(1) doesn't support -printf, so I wouldn't expect OS X's to either. Instead, this should work on a BSD-ish system:

find . -print0 | xargs -0 stat -f '%i '

It'll fail on a GNU-userland system, though, where you'd write xargs -0 -r stat -c '%i ' because xargs(1) and stat(1) behavior is different.

Related questions

Unable to find Applications folder in Mac's terminal

I tried the following code unsuccessfully find Applications | xargs -0 grep Applications I also tried the following unsuccessfully find Applications

Read More
How do I install pip on macOS or OS X?

I spent most of the day yesterday searching for a clear answer for installing pip (package manager for Python). I can't find a good solution. How do I install it?

Read More
Find (and kill) process locking port 3000 on Mac

How do I find (and kill) processes that listen to/use my tcp ports? I'm on mac os x. Sometimes, after a crash or some bug, my rails app is locking port 3000. I can't find it using ps -ef... When …

Read More