I'm reading the paper below and I have some trouble , understanding the concept of negative sampling.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.3722v1.pdf
Can anyone help , please?
The idea of word2vec
is to maximise the similarity (dot product) between the vectors for words which appear close together (in the context of each other) in text, and minimise the similarity of words that do not. In equation (3) of the paper you link to, ignore the exponentiation for a moment. You have
v_c * v_w
-------------------
sum(v_c1 * v_w)
The numerator is basically the similarity between words c
(the context) and w
(the target) word. The denominator computes the similarity of all other contexts c1
and the target word w
. Maximising this ratio ensures words that appear closer together in text have more similar vectors than words that do not. However, computing this can be very slow, because there are many contexts c1
. Negative sampling is one of the ways of addressing this problem- just select a couple of contexts c1
at random. The end result is that if cat
appears in the context of food
, then the vector of food
is more similar to the vector of cat
(as measures by their dot product) than the vectors of several other randomly chosen words (e.g. democracy
, greed
, Freddy
), instead of all other words in language. This makes word2vec
much much faster to train.