Is rename() atomic?

linux file-rename atomicity vfs
Lipika Deka picture Lipika Deka · Aug 14, 2011 · Viewed 24.9k times · Source

I am not being able to check this via experiments and could not gather it from the man pages as well.

Say I have two processes, one moving(rename) file1 from directory1 to directory2. Say the other process running concurrently copies the contents of directory1 and directory2 to another location. Is it possible that the copy happens in such a way that both directory1 and directory2 will show file1 - i.e directory1 is copied before the move and directory2 after the move by the first process.

Basically is rename() is an atomic system call?

Thanks

Answer

Joshua picture Joshua · Aug 14, 2011

Yes and no.

rename() is atomic assuming the OS does not crash. It cannot be split by any other filesystem op.

If the system crashes you might see a ln() operation instead.

Also note, when operating on a network filesystem, you might get ENOENT when the operation succeeded successfully. Local filesystem can't do that to you.

Related questions

Batch rename files

I want to batch re-name a number of files in a directory so that the preceding number and hypen are stripped from the file name. Old file name: 2904495-XXX_01_xxxx_20130730235001_00000000.NEW New file name: XXX_01_xxxx_20130730235001_00000000.NEW How can I …

Read More
Change Names of Multiple Files Linux

I have a number of files with names a1.txt, b1.txt, c1,txt...on ubuntu machine. Is there any quick way to change all file names to a2.txt, b2.txt, c2.txt...? In particular, I'd like to replace …

Read More
Get the Perl rename utility instead of the built-in rename

Many sites (including various SO articles) talk about using "rename" using Perl expressions to rename files. This would be perfect, but apparently this is not the rename utility I have, and none of these articles seem to comprehend that there …

Read More